these complaints related mainly to the lack of access to
the Ambassador, and they should be remedied by the
arrangement made under which the Ambassador will reside
for considerable periods at Nanking.
He should also
arrange to pay frequent visits to Shanghai: indeed,
from many points of view, it would be preferable if the
Embassy was located in Shanghai.
The present aivision
of the Embassy Services between Peking, Nanking and
Shanghai constitutes a real handicap to efficiency and
the more they can be concentrated either at Nanking or at
Shanghai the better. As regards the Consular Services,
the complaints appeared to be more substantial and to
merit close investigation. I have no means of judging
but the unofficial
the official work of these officers;
contacts which I had with them left me with the
impression that something is wrong.
Some of the
officers in particular the Consuls-General at Canton
<<
and Tientsin appeared to me admirable; but in other
places there was evidence of staleness, discouragement
and indifference.
the Consular Service, as a
Moreover,
whole, seemed to have inadequate contact with local
Chinese banking and business leaders. I suggest that the
Consular Services in China and Japan should be carefully
investigated by one of the Inspector-Generals of the
Consular Service and that the personnel should be
reviewed in the light of his Report. I also suggest
that the Head of the Mission should convene conferences
with the local Consular officers at the Embassy er at
other centres, when he is on tour,
Sn as to give them
more opportunities of exchanging views both with him and
with one another.
-14-
123
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.